Clinical services · Durable medical equipment

The document that decides the claim is collected on the day, or not at all

Equipment claims are decided by paperwork created at the point of supply and demanded a year later. Attergo makes evidence a condition of closing an obligation, chases it before the date rather than after it, and carries an equipment procedure code on the catalogue entry alongside the professional one.

Attergo: the prior authorization case list, showing cases by stage with the payer and the days remaining on each.
The problem

The evidence is created at delivery and demanded a year later

A written order and a signed record are five-minute artefacts on the day and unobtainable afterwards. They are also the first two things a reviewer asks for. The outcome of an equipment review is usually settled at the point of supply, by whoever did or did not collect a signature, months before anybody knew there would be a review.

What the platform does

The mechanism behind it.

Evidence closes an obligation, or it stays open

A task that requires evidence cannot be marked done without a file or a signed attestation on the record. Until it has one the obligation stays open and stays visible.

Reminders run ahead of the date

Notices go out at intervals before an obligation falls due, so the work lands while the evidence still exists rather than after somebody has gone looking for it.

Equipment codes live on the catalogue entry

The catalogue entry carries an equipment procedure code alongside the professional one, so a supplied item is coded from the same catalogue everything else is coded from.

Signed, timed, and corrected in the open

Whoever attested and when sit on the record, and a later correction keeps the original alongside the reason for it rather than replacing it.

Ask what a service costs you to deliver.

A read-only connection and credentials you can revoke. We come back with what the last month of clinical work produced, using your own numbers.