Every minute you bill has a signed record behind it
A monitoring programme is reviewed on the records it left behind. Attergo holds the billing and evidence side of one: each interaction recorded as a signed, timed encounter carrying its own minutes, claims scrubbed against your own payer rows before transmission, and remittances parsed, matched and held for review.
The codes are easy. The records are not
The form is not hard and the codes are not hard. What is hard is showing, months later and out of records made at the time, who did the work and how long it took. A figure assembled afterwards from a monthly summary looks defensible and is not, and it is exactly the figure a reviewer asks to see the working for.
The mechanism behind it.
Time is recorded at the visit
Minutes sit on the encounter as a number entered when the work happened, alongside the practitioner who did it and the moment they signed.
The catalogue entry decides what must be captured
Codes, modifiers, place of service, fee and the documentation template live on the entry and are edited by whoever owns the service. Adding a required field is configuration, not a release.
Claims are scrubbed against your payer rows
Subscriber identifier format, authorization requirements, place of service, diagnosis pointers, filing age, modifiers, quantity and credentialing are all tested before transmission. Errors block. Warnings do not.
Remittances are matched, then held for review
Payments are parsed and matched against the claim, then wait for a person to release them. A payment that reconciles itself is a payment nobody checked.
Ask what a service costs you to deliver.
A read-only connection and credentials you can revoke. We come back with what the last month of clinical work produced, using your own numbers.